US / LDOS
Leidos Holdings, Inc.LDOS · NYSE
Market discounts Leidos as budget cuts or contract terminations could hit the 87% of revenue tied to U.S. government spending.
Why the market may be pricing it low
Nearly 87% of revenue comes from U.S. government contracts, making the company's fate hinge on a single customer's budget.
generated 87% of revenues for the fiscal year ended January 2, 2026, (“fiscal 2025”) from U.S. government contracts, either as a prime contractor or a subcontractor to othersBusiness
Leidos itself warns that shifts in U.S. government budget priorities could sharply cut revenue and growth, a fragility the market already prices in.
A decline in the U.S. government budget, changes in spending or budgetary priorities or delays in contract awards may significantly and adversely affect our future revenues and limit our growth prospects.Risk factors
The government can terminate or unfavorably renegotiate contracts at any time, so today's profitability is seen as not guaranteed to persist.
The U.S. government may terminate, cancel, modify, renew on less favorable terms or curtail our contracts at any time prior to their completionRisk factors
What could close the gap
An 8-K on 2026-03-30 (Item 2.01) disclosing completion of an asset acquisition or disposition could be read as diversifying away from pure government dependence.
2026-03-30 Item 2.01,7.01,9.018-K filings
Successive 8-Ks with Item 1.01 (material agreements) in January and April 2026 could signal new major contract wins that ease concerns over government budget risk.
2026-04-15 Item 1.01,7.01,9.018-K filings
Meeting customer-driven cybersecurity certifications like CMMC is described as necessary to win future contracts, so visible progress here could shift views on competitiveness.
increasingly subject to customer-driven cybersecurity certification requirements, including but not limited to CMMC, which are expected to be necessary to win future contractsMD&A
How a buyer could still lose (value trap)
The Piotroski check shows the leverage ratio did not improve year over year, meaning debt has grown; if government budgets tighten, repayment burden could weigh more heavily.
Based on the figures below
The company admits it may not realize the full amount reflected in its backlog as revenue, so current profitability could rest partly on backlog that never converts.
We may not realize the full amounts reflected in our backlog as revenues, which could adversely affect our expected future revenues and growth prospects.Risk factors
Drafted by AI on 29 Sep 2026 from the figures on this page and excerpts of the filing only (no web search). Each point's quote was checked by machine against the filing text; points whose quote could not be found are not shown. These are hypotheses, not findings. Latest 10-K (SEC)
Financial quality (Piotroski F-score)
- ✓Profitable (ROA > 0)
- ✓Positive operating cash flow
- ✓ROA up on last year
- ✓Cash flow exceeds net profit
- ✗Leverage down on last year
- ✓Current ratio up on last year
- ✓No new shares issued
- –Gross margin up on last yearno data
- ✓Asset turnover up on last year
Scored out of the checks with data, scaled to 9. Compares the latest year with the year before.
Figures
- Sales
- $17.6bn
- Operating profit
- $2.0bn
- Net profit
- $1.4bn
- Operating cash flow
- $2.3bn
- Cash
- $748m
- Debt
- $1.2bn
- Equity
- $5.3bn
Latest twelve months to 2026-07-03; F-score for the fiscal year to 2026-01-02
This site ranks companies whose share price is low relative to their profits, using public filings and market prices, and has AI draft hypotheses on why they are cheap from those filings. The hypotheses are unverified. Nothing here is a price forecast or a recommendation to buy or sell. Not investment advice.
Updated 29 Sep 2026 12:31 JST